Sophia Emy
Behavioral Systems Analysis Evidn Internship

Enhancing Green Work

A behavioral systems analysis of how to strengthen recruitment, retention, and long-term impact in green workforce programs — by reshaping the incentives and status around the work, not just the messaging.

RQ

How might we support efforts to distribute environmental resources while simultaneously tackling economic inequality?

Conducted independently during my Behavioral Science internship at Evidn. Stakeholder framed as a NYC-based climate-justice nonprofit; this is not an official client deliverable.

Role

Behavioral Scientist (Intern)

  • Ran an independent behavioral analysis during my Evidn internship
  • Synthesized contextual and stakeholder factors
  • Translated insights into strategy-facing recommendations
Methods
Literature review Stakeholder synthesis Lewin's Force Field analysis Driver–barrier mapping Impact × feasibility Systems interpretation
Outcome
  • Surfaced legitimacy, pathway clarity, and alumni visibility as high-impact levers
  • Showed participation is shaped by economic context and identity alignment
  • Reframed participation as a systems challenge, not a motivation problem
01 — Research

What the research says

When economic pressure is high, green work can read as frivolous next to more urgent life challenges. It gets coded as low social value — and participation becomes hard to sustain. The result is a self-reinforcing cycle in which the people most likely to benefit face the steepest barriers to entry.

Self-reinforcing barrier cycle
High economic pressure
Green work coded as low social value
Participation hard to sustain
Less visibility and community impact
reinforces itself
Virtuous engagement cycle
Paid opportunity + material support
Visible community impact
Social recognition and status
Participation builds momentum
builds momentum
Increasing participation means shifting the incentive and status environment — not just awareness or motivation.
02 — Force Field

Drivers & barriers

To use the positive loop, I mapped what pulls people toward green work against what holds them back — grouped by the underlying force at play.

Force
Drivers — pull toward
Barriers — push away
Economic support
Paid positions, stipends, and immediate material support
Housing instability, caregiving demands, economic precarity
Social signaling
Uniforms, media visibility, and institutional endorsements
Green work perceived as low-status or “frivolous”
Opportunity pathways
Clear routes into jobs, education, and advancement
Unclear post-program pathways; underused alumni network
Identity & belonging
Community impact and visible peer role models
Low perceived relevance to participants’ daily lives
Takeaway

Sustained engagement requires aligning economic support, social signaling, and opportunity pathways — not pulling any single lever.

03 — Prioritization

Impact vs. feasibility

With limited resources, the goal is to find the levers that are both high-impact and tractable today. Several high-impact barriers sit comfortably inside the current program ecosystem; others, while important, fall outside its scope.

Impact →
Focus zone
Legitimacy cues
Alumni network
Pathway clarity
Eco messaging
Structural instability
Feasibility →
Near-term focus
  • 01 Strengthen legitimacy signals
  • 02 Clarify post-program pathways
  • 03 Activate existing social infrastructure

Structural barriers like housing instability matter deeply, but sit outside program scope.

This is a systems challenge, not a motivation problem.
04 — Recommendations

Four deliverables for the client

Each targets a high-impact, feasible lever — strengthening legitimacy, clarifying pathways, and activating the social infrastructure that already exists.

01

Enhance legitimacy cues

Amplify uniforms, media visibility, and institutional endorsements to raise the perceived status of green work.

02

Demonstrate aligned goals

Connect sustainability to immediate community benefits — cleaner air, cooling shade, local food.

03

Activate the alumni network

Deploy alumni as peer mentors, recruiters, and role models to reinforce credibility and social proof.

04

Clarify post-program pathways

Visualize job and education outcomes through storytelling, alumni panels, and “next steps” guides.

Project wrap-up

Engagement is shaped by context, not attitudes alone.

Participation in green workforce programs is driven less by environmental attitudes and more by the interaction of economic pressure, social signaling, and perceived opportunity. People sustain involvement when programs offer immediate material support, clear pathways forward, and visible signals of legitimacy.

Several high-impact barriers remain structural — housing instability, caregiving demands, broader economic precarity. Program design alone can't resolve these, so interventions should be framed as part of a broader support ecosystem rather than standalone fixes.